We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.
History

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Why Was Wearing Slacks to Court So Controversial in 1938?

Margaret Lipman
By
Updated: May 17, 2024
Views: 718
Share

In November 1938, Helen Hulick came to court as a witness, but she left in custody – all because of her choice of wardrobe.

The 28-year-old kindergarten teacher wore slacks during her court appearance in Los Angeles, where she was testifying as a witness about a burglary. However, the actual crime became an afterthought to the courtroom drama that unfolded. Judge Arthur S. Guerin halted the trial, demanding that Hulick wear a dress on the rescheduled court date. Apparently, her choice to wear pants – unusual for women at the time – was distracting from the court proceedings. She refused and appeared in slacks again the next time, and the time after that.

On her third trouser-clad court appearance, Guerin made good on his warning to jail her, citing disorderly behavior and contempt of court. She was sentenced to five days in jail – where she was forced to wear a denim dress, though she was released later the same day. A visit to the Appellate Court – supported by hundreds of pro-slacks letters – overturned Guerin’s ruling, allowing Hulick to wear whatever she wanted. Having made her point and cleared the way for future generations of women to make their own wardrobe choices, Hulick chose a formal evening dress and high heels for her next visit to the courtroom, as the burglary trial finally went ahead.

“If he puts me in jail I hope it will help to free women forever of anti-slackism”:

  • “You tell the judge I will stand on my rights. If he orders me to change into a dress I won’t do it. I like slacks. They’re comfortable,” Hulick told the Los Angeles Times.

  • Following her principled stand for equality in clothing choices, Helen Hulick (later known by her married name, Helen Beebe) became a pioneer in deaf education and speech therapy, specifically auditory-verbal therapy, which utilizes residual hearing to help with speech development.

  • Beebe founded a speech and hearing center that she directed for over 40 years, and was active in many groups and organizations, such as the Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, the Foundation for Children’s Hearing, Education, and Research, and Auditory-Verbal International (AVI).

Share
WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Margaret Lipman
By Margaret Lipman
With years of experience as an educator, Margaret Lipman produces thoughtful and informative content across a wide range of topics. Her articles cover essential areas such as finance, parenting, health and wellness, nutrition, educational strategies. Margaret's writing is guided by her passion for enriching the lives of her readers through practical advice and well-researched information.

Editors' Picks

Discussion Comments
Margaret Lipman
Margaret Lipman
With years of experience as an educator, Margaret Lipman produces thoughtful and informative content across a wide range...
Learn more
Share
https://www.wisegeek.net/why-was-wearing-pants-to-court-so-controversial-in-1938.htm
Copy this link
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.