We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.
Medicine

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

What Are the Pros and Cons of Ablation for Arrhythmia?

A. Pasbjerg
By
Updated: May 17, 2024

People suffering from arrhythmia, or an irregular heartbeat, may benefit from a procedure called ablation, but there are drawbacks to this form of treatment. Ablation for arrhythmia involves destroying a very small area in the heart to block abnormal electrical currents, which is typically effective for curing the condition. It can often be done non-surgically via a catheter to the heart, though there are also surgical options available to patients for whom it is more appropriate. Unfortunately, no matter how it is performed, the procedure is invasive and can cause complications. Recovery is also fairly long, from several weeks to about two months, and patients may need to be on medication until healed.

One of the biggest pros of ablation for arrhythmia is that it usually cures the condition. By destroying the electrical pathway in the heart that is malfunctioning, the arrhythmia is usually effectively eliminated. This means that patients will no longer suffer from the condition, nor will they have to use medications or other ongoing treatments to manage the issue.

Another positive aspect of ablation for arrhythmia is that it can often be done non-surgically, which lowers the risk of complications for the patient. Patients are often awake and only mildly sedated during the procedure, during which a catheter is inserted through an incision in the groin into a blood vessel up to the heart, where it is then used to do the ablation. For certain patients, a full surgical procedure may be necessary, in which case there are a number of options, including some minimally invasive techniques that can be done with an endoscope.

On the con side, ablation for arrhythmia is always invasive to some extent, whether it is done surgically or not, which means there are always risks to the patient. Inserting a catheter through a vein or artery into the heart can damage those structures and may cause blood clots. Surgical procedures carry their own set of risks, including a bad reaction to general anesthesia, infection, and damage to the heart.

Recovery time is another negative aspect of using ablation for arrhythmia. Patients can expect to spend anywhere from several days to a week in the hospital afterward, some of it in the intensive care unit, as patients need to be closely monitored for a period of time to ensure they are stable. After that, the patient may need to be on medication such as anticoagulants or diuretics for some time and can expect recovery to take about one to two months.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
A. Pasbjerg
By A. Pasbjerg
Andrea Pasbjerg, a WiseGeek contributor, holds an MBA from West Chester University of Pennsylvania. Her business background helps her to create content that is both informative and practical, providing readers with valuable insights and strategies for success in the business world.
Discussion Comments
A. Pasbjerg
A. Pasbjerg
Andrea Pasbjerg, a WiseGeek contributor, holds an MBA from West Chester University of Pennsylvania. Her business background helps her to create content that is both informative and practical, providing readers with valuable insights and strategies for success in the business world.
Share
https://www.wisegeek.net/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-ablation-for-arrhythmia.htm
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.