We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

How Would You Build an Interstellar Spacecraft?

Michael Anissimov
Updated May 17, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

It's not extremely difficult in principle to construct an interstellar spacecraft: we've already made five, being Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Voyager 1, Voyager 2, and New Horizons. All these space probes are moving at escape velocity from the solar system and will one day reach other star systems.

The problem with these craft from a practical point of view is that all of them will require millions of years to reach these star systems. Although these probes will not explore other stars in the immediate future, some of them, Voyager 2 in particular, are already sending back data on the interface between our solar wind (the heliosphere) and the diffuse interstellar medium.

If you want to build an interstellar spacecraft that reaches its target star within a reasonable amount of time, say, 50 years, then this requires some form of propulsion significantly more powerful than chemical rockets, which are extremely inefficient. Possible sources include nuclear, in pulse propulsion and nuclear gas core reactor variants, solar sails, electromagnetic launchers, and antimatter propulsion systems. Although antimatter propulsion and EM launchers would require technology more sophisticated than we have now, the nuclear and solar sail options are within reach of our current technology.

In the 70s, the British Interplanetary society did a detailed study of an interstellar probe design that would be able to make it to Bernard's Star (6 light years away) in only fifty years. This interstellar probe design used nuclear pulse propulsion, meaning it tossed atomic bombs behind itself, letting them transfer some of their energy to pusher plates, which would accelerate the craft forward. Based on their calculations, the probe could achieve speeds 10% of the speed of light. This is around the limit for nuclear propulsion.

With antimatter or electromagnetic launchers, speeds closer to that of light could be achieved. Technical challenges for antimatter include producing it in the necessary quantities (we can only produce picograms of antimatter today, for millions of dollars) and adequately containing it. Challenges for electromagnetic launchers are providing the necessary energy (in the petawatt range) and length (hundreds of kilometers) to launch a interstellar probe to near light speed.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov , Writer
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated WiseGeek contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism to his articles. An avid blogger, Michael is deeply passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. His professional experience includes work with the Methuselah Foundation, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and Lifeboat Foundation, further showcasing his commitment to scientific advancement.

Discussion Comments

By Ana1234 — On Mar 29, 2014

@browncoat - Unfortunately, it's extremely expensive and completely theoretical at the moment. It would make it easier to ship materials into space, but I've always been kind of worried it would make it too easy. I mean, we barely have enough stuff on Earth at the moment without pumping a whole lot of it into space for the benefit of only a few people.

By browncoat — On Mar 29, 2014

@clintflint - Honestly, I don't think it matters too much what kinds of crafts eventually reach other stars. We will come up with something and probably more than one kind of something.

I think the real problem at the moment is battling our own atmosphere.

Anything we happen to throw up there is just going to keep going. It's a matter of getting it up there in the first place and getting it to the point where it's traveling fast enough to make it worth the trip. And I think the best way of doing this is the space elevator. I really hope that they manage to make one of these within my lifetime because it would really revolutionize the way we live and the way we travel in space.

By clintflint — On Mar 28, 2014

I have always loved the idea of a solar sail. I didn't realize that we could theoretically make one at the moment.

The idea is that you make a material that is so thin and large that it can act as a sail for a solar wind, which is constantly coming off the sun.

Since there is very little to no friction in space, all you would need to do is get up speed from the sun and then you could keep going at the same pace.

Maneuvering would be a problem in deep space though, so you'd want to have some kind of backup.

Michael Anissimov

Michael Anissimov


Michael Anissimov is a dedicated WiseGeek contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology,...
Learn more
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.