We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Are People Predisposed to Root for the Underdog?

Whether it was a sports competition or a political election, we have all rooted for the underdog at one point. Was this because we were truly rooting for that team or person, or did we do it because we are predisposed to root for the underdog, regardless of who or what it is? A group of researchers attempted to answer this question with a study involving infants, squares, and circles. As the circle appeared to pursue, bump, and smash the yellow square, the researchers observed the reactions of the infants. Some 16 out of 20 infants reached out for the yellow block. Researchers believe that this may be a sign of human beings' predisposition to root for the underdog.

The study, published in PLOS ONE journal in 2013, also tested the infants' preference between an aggressor, a victim and a bystander-- in this case, a red cylinder. They found that infants preferred the bystander over the aggressor and the victim over the bystander. Researchers are not completely certain whether these results mean that humans are naturally predisposed to sympathize with the victim. But they do believe that the human brain is able to establish causation and place a negative value on aggression at the age of ten months.

Other researchers offer a completely different interpretation of this phenomenon. They don't believe that humans root for the underdog; instead, they believe that we root against the dominant entity.

More about children and learning:

  • At age two and a half, children are able to notice and correct grammatical mistakes.
  • Researchers believe that children who receive more attention and nurturing at home will demonstrate higher IQs.
  • Children of college-educated parents hear an average of 2,153 words spoken to them per hour.

Related Articles

Discussion Comments
By anon994235 — On Jan 26, 2016

I think it has to do with the predisposition of our brains to find symmetry. The only way to achieve symmetry is to support the underdog.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.